Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOWEN, District Judge.
The 1953 fiscal year’s income of a joint venture, of which Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. (the defendant below, being both appellant and appellee here, and hereinafter referred to as Rushlight) was a member, was pursuant to § 3806(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3806(b), renegotiated for excessive profits by the Los Angeles Regional Renegotiation Board. In September 1956 the Board determined that the joint venture had received excessive profits of which Rushlight’s individual share was $22,-250. Thereupon the District Director of Internal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Campbell (United States, Intervenor) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Libbie Merlin v. P. K. Sanders, Acting District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of America, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. SarkozyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1951
- Nelson Specialty Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
- United States v. FaillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Garth GuyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Wilkes-Barre Carriage Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Richard E. Warner and Virginia A. Warner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- The United States of America v. The Russell Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. C & R Investments, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.