Legal Opinion

Ruth Gordon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 15, 1985No. 84-3094PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge:

This ease is a suit by taxpayer Ruth Gordon to recover payment of a deficiency, plus interest and penalties, which arose as a result of the Internal Revenue Service partially disallowing a refund. This refund had been granted on the basis of joint tax returns by Gordon and her ex-husband and had been credited to a separate tax liability which had been incurred by him. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that Gordon was entitled to recover the deficiency payment. The United States appeals, arguing that the Internal Revenue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richard E. Warner and Virginia A. Warner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Rosen v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Fine v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  4. United States v. MooneyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1975

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Lucille E. Kistner F/k/a/ Lucille E. Weasel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Taborski v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. Ransier v. McFarland (In Re McFarland)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
  4. United States v. Marcus Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Cooper v. Cooper (In Re Cooper)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API