Everett v. . Station
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBkogdbN, J.
The question presented by the record is whether or not the plaintiffs are entitled to the excess collateral now in the hands of defendant receiver by virtue of the equity of subrogation.
Subrogation is of two kinds, to wit, legal and conventional. “Legal subrogation is based upon payment and exists where one who has an interest to protect or is secondarily liable makes payment, while conventional subrogation, so named from the convention or agreement of the civil law, is founded upon the agreement of the parties, which really amounts to an equitable assignment.” Joyner v. Reflector Co., 176 N.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duke v. . MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Journal Publishing Co. v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Cleveland Cotton Mills v. Commissioners of Cleveland CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Bailey v. . HassellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Grantham v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Neal v. . Wake CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- First National Bank v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Tuttle v. Junior Building Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Green River Manufacturing Co. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.