Legal Opinion

Reeser v. Hammond

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1927No. 27,111PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

M. Reeser began this action against J. M. Hammond to recover damages for fraud in making false representations by which he was induced to buy twenty acres of an oil and gas lease in Dickinson county from a man named Laughters for $2,000. Reeser having died, his executrix was substituted as plaintiff. Judgment was rendered against the defendant and he appeals.

1. One John Breitenbach testified that a little after the buying of the lease by Reeser the witness had bought a like acreage a few miles away for the same amount from Laughters upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trapp v. Railroad Men's Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Cramer v. OverfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Graves v. NegySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Divani v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Miller v. BraunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Tawzer v. McAdamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Chute v. Old American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  5. Marion v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API