Legal Opinion
City of Salem v. H.S.B.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1987No. CC 132292 CA A31107 SC S32285PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This is a condemnation case in which plaintiff, the City of Salem (the City) seeks review of a judgment for defendants and intervenor. The case began when the City condemned a portion of property belonging to defendants Hill, Brady and the Staatses, through their partnership, H.S.B., (defendants) for use as a highway right-of-way. Intervenor M.P. Materials Corporation (MPM) claimed severance damages as a result of the condemnation, arguing in its answer to the City’s complaint that its separate tract of property was also “damaged because it is irrevocably committed to a unified use with that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sams v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Jonas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Board of Transportation v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Hambleton Bros. Lumber Co. v. Balkin Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Neidig v. Superior National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Hospital Products, Inc. v. Sterile Design, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
- Acrymed, Inc. v. ConvatecDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.