Legal Opinion

Sams v. Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 15, 1968No. Appeal, 203PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

In the exercise of its power of eminent domain, appellant, Redevelopment Authority of the City of New Kensington, adopted a resolution condemning a certain parcel of land situate in New Kensington. The parcel of land condemned was individually owned by appellees, William Sams and Samuel Mannarino and was situate on the west side of North Third Avenue. On February 17, 1964, the date of taking, the condemned parcel was being used as a yard for the receipt, salvaging, bailing and shipping of scrap metal.

At the time of the taking, the individual appellees owned another…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. SpebackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Satler v. RiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Hargrave v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Wedner Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Advanced Telephone Systems, Inc. v. Com-Net Professional Mobile Radio, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API