Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Ray

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 2, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2007-1148Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSOLIDATED RAIL : CORPORATION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 07-1148 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 11, 15 : JAMES T. RAY, for the Estate of : HAROLD F. BOYD, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), commenced this action seeking declaratory relief under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (“Rail Act”),

45 U.S.C. §§ 701

et seq., as amended…

2Cases cited31 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.