Novotny v. Horecka
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
The plaintiff, Mary R. Novotny, formerly Mary'R. Prochaska, and Elmer W. Prochaska, then husband and wife, in 1912 acquired the premises in controversy in Belle Plaine as their home, and with their children occupied them until October, 1918, when the plaintiff commenced suit for divorce, and obtained an order’restraining the husband from coming on the premises. The defendant in that suit filed a cross-petition for divorce. In March, 1919, the former order was-set aside by an order providing:
“The defendant is restored to his rights to use and occupy his home in Belle Plaine, Iowa, and to have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. DaytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Sherrid v. SouthwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Swingle v. SwingleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Lunt v. NeeleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Vittengl v. VittenglSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BrentUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- Meech v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
- Sanne v. SanneNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Siegel v. ClemonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954