Legal Opinion

Morinaga v. Vue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 24, 1997No. 15240-5-IIIPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Gail Morinaga sued Dr. George Rice and Dr. Mary Sanderson for failure to provide informed consent, and breach of professional duty regarding a sterilization procedure. She sued See Vue, Jean Soliz, the Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), and DSHS for civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and battery. These claims were dismissed pursuant to summary judgment motions by each set of defendants. She now appeals, claiming genuine issues of material fact exist precluding summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Ms. Morinaga is a 25-year-old…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wolfgang Arnold v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Backlund v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sutton v. Tacoma School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Colwell v. Holy Family HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Colwell v. Holy Family Hosp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. In re the Marriage of TomsovicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API