Legal Opinion

Backlund v. University of Washington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1999No. 66096-4PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

We are asked to apply Washington’s informed consent law for health care patients, RCW 7.70.050, in a case where the Backlunds allege Dr. Craig Jackson committed malpractice while he was employed by the University of Washington (University). They contend he was negligent in continuing to treat Ashley Backlund’s jaundice at birth with phototherapy. They argue he should have abandoned phototherapy, a more conservative form of treatment for jaundice, or applied it in conjunction with a transfusion of Ashley’s blood, a riskier procedure. A jury, however, exonerated Dr. Jackson and the University…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ashe v. Radiation Oncology AssociatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ike J. WHITE III v. David A. BEEKS, M.DTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Reyes v. Yakima Health Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Hall v. FrankelColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Ketchup v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API