Legal Opinion

Park v. McCoy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1922No. 17007PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

On or about January 22, 1921, Turner-Hutchinson & Company, real estate agents in Seattle representing the appellant, and the respondents, negotiated a deal for the sale of certain real estate presumed to belong to the appellant. At that time the agreement was reduced to a writing called an earnest *190money receipt. This instrument provided that the real estate agents were selling on'behalf of the appellant: “2-% acres — a portion of the and the SE14 of the SW14 of section 7, Tp. 26, N. R. 4 E. W. M.,” for a consideration of $5,400, $500 of which was to be paid down in cash, and $1,500 more upon…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bodon Ex Rel. Bodon v. SuhrmannUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jenson v. RichensWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Dail v. South Dakota Real Estate CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Sloman v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API