Legal Opinion

Jenson v. Richens

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1968No. 39187PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

One of the long-cherished rights afforded by a free society is that of freedom to contract. Within the rules which separate the lawful from the unlawful, a competent person may contract with any person on whatever terms he chooses. He may sign whatever instrument he likes and bind himself to whatever lawful undertaking he desires. He may draw the instrument of agreement himself or sign one prepared by another. Implicit in this freedom to contract is the freedom from advice of counsel. The law, while it may discourage, does not prevent any legally competent person from acting as his own…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. White & Bollard, Inc. v. GoodenowWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Cobb v. WillrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mahoney v. TingleyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Knight, Vale & Gregory v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Ashley v. LanceWashington Supreme Court · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API