Legal Opinion

County of Yuba v. Kate Hayes Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1903No. Sac. No. 874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. -

1Opinion of the Court

ANGELLOTTI, J.—

This action was brought by the plaintiff, the owner of certain lots of land in the city of Marysville, county of Yuba, in which are situated the county courthouse, county jail, hall of records, and county hospital, and also the owner of the wagon-bridge crossing the Yuba River from the foot of D Street in said city, to obtain a decree enjoining defendants from discharging débris from their mineral lands into Sweetland Creek and the Yuba River, or any branch thereof, to the injury of plaintiff’s said property. On the trial, the action was dismissed as to all of the defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
  2. Fisher v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Broun v. Texas & N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Merced Dredging Co. v. Merced CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946
  5. San Dieguito Partnership v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API