Legal Opinion
Merced Dredging Co. v. Merced County
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 29, 1946No. 378PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 F.Supp. 598 (1946)
MERCED DREDGING CO.
v.
MERCED COUNTY et al.
No. 378.
District Court, S. D. California, N. D.
June 29, 1946.
Robert M. Searls, of San Francisco, and C. Ray Robinson, of Merced, Cal., for plaintiff.
Claude H. Adams, Dist. Atty., and William R. Elam, Deputy Dist. Atty., both of Merced, Cal., and Walter H. Stammer, of Fresno, Cal., for defendants.
MATHES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Merced Dredging Company, a Nevada corporation authorized to engage in business in California, has filed in this court a bill of complaint against the county of Merced, California, and the legislative and…
2Cases cited128 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. FosterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Andrus v. ClickIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Holmes v. Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.