Cassella v. Allen
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff allowing recovery for the balance due on an oral contract for materials and services. The plaintiff, operating under the trade name of Royal Fence Company, entered into an oral agreement with the defendants to erect a three-foot chain-link fence on the property of the defendants in Stony Creek, Connecticut.
Four errors were assigned by the defendants, each attacking the finding. The first assignment of error states that the court erred in failing to correct the finding by striking out the words "after completion of the work" in paragraph…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunn v. SantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- City Bank Trust Co. v. Ruthinian Greek Catholic Ch.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Holmes v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Tryon v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kwiechien v. GordonConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- Kwiechien v. GordonConnecticut Superior Court · 1976