City Bank Trust Co. v. Ruthinian Greek Catholic Ch.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The defendant filed in the trial court a motion to correct the finding containing ten paragraphs. The court granted this motion in part and in part denied it. In its appeal the defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to make all the corrections sought, and certain of the evidence was certified to this court.
There was evidence from which all facts could have been found directly or by inference, and therefore the motion to correct was properly denied. “It is not essential that statements of fact in a finding should always be supported by direct evidence. It is enough if the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Defeo v. HindingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- McCarthy v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Craig v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Klahr v. KostopoulosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Bown v. Waterbury Battery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Del Gaudio v. IngersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.