McIntyre v. Johnston
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Robert H. Lindsay, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered October IS, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for an accounting.
1Per curiam
This is a suit for a partnership accounting. It is prosecuted by the'plaintiff upon the theory that there was a partnership formed between him and the defendant E. W. Johnston, in the year 1901, for the purpose of conducting a towing business at Nome, Alaska, and that one of the small boats constituting a part of the partnership property was traded by Johnston for a certain placer mining claim situated near Nome, in the summer of 1904, resulting in the claim becoming the property of the partnership. While the suit was for a general partnership accounting, there is, as we understand the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Santos v. MackWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Hagen v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913