Legal Opinion
Hagen v. Mills
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1913No. 11254Published
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered October 19, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title.
1Opinion
On Petition eor Rehearing.
[Decided September 13, 1913.]
2Per curiam
— A petition for rehearing has been filed in which respondents complain that this court has overlooked, and by its omission has overruled, the many decisions of this court holding that, where no exceptions are taken to the findings of fact, the court will not review the case except to inquire whether the findings sustain the decree or judgment. Counsel say:
“We cited-repeated rulings of this court to the effect that the failure to take exceptions to the findings of fact is ground for striking the statement of facts and for preventing the…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Yakima Grocery Co. v. BenoitWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- McAllister v. McAllisterWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Berens v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Murray v. ShoudyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- McIntyre v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911