Legal Opinion
Santos v. Mack
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1955No. 32982PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants made two assignments of error. ■The second one is:
“2. The Court erred in entering judgment awarding the disputed strip of ground to the respondents without finding that the respondents had satisfied the requisites for establishing title by adverse possession.”
The assignment is not well taken. The trial court’s finding of fact No. 2 fully establishes all the requisites for adverse possession.
Appellants’ first assignment was directed to the trial court’s memorandum opinion. The respondents’ brief answered:
“The court’s memorandum opinion is not a finding of fact, McIntyre v. Johnston,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- McIntyre v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KrajeskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. KrajeskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001