Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 2014No. A12-1575, A12-1972Published

1DissentLillehaug, Justice

Today a blameless plaintiff, who was thrown out of her wheelchair onto a cement sidewalk, is denied a remedy for half of the damages she suffered. Today the solvent tortfeasor, whose negligence caused the plaintiff to be thrown onto the cement sidewalk, benefits. This result violates the plain words of the law, judicially amends what the Legislature did not, and ignores our long-standing rule that statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed. So I respectfully dissent.

I

Minnesota has followed the common law rule of joint and several liability since at least 1888. See…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API