Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1985No. 83-5238Published

1DissentWellford, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that the government should not be entitled to recover as a third party beneficiary of the insurance contract. However, I cannot agree that the government should not be allowed reimbursement under the Kentucky no-fault statute.

*668In United States v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 605 F.2d 669 (2d Cir.1979), the Second Circuit held that under the New York no-fault statute, the government could recover from an insurer medical expenses paid out for a serviceman’s injuries. The relevant language of that statutory scheme was explained as follows:

Section 672(l)(a) of New…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heusle v. National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Dairyland Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Company v. John Rozmyslowicz, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Gregory v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API