Legal Opinion

Forstmann, C., Co. v. United Front, C.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 10, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On May 11th, 1926, an injunctive order was allowed restraining the defendants from certain acts during the progress of a strike at the complainant's mills. On May 27th, 1926, notice of this motion was served upon the complainant's solicitors of record, by leaving a copy thereof with someone in charge of the office. There was some slight irregularity in the service, but no point has been made thereof, presumably for the reason that any such objection would be grossly technical. Upon the day mentioned in the notice, to wit, June 1st, 1926, counsel for the proponents appeared in support of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Groel v. United Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  2. Allman v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  3. Hermann v. Mexican Petroleum Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  4. Schalk v. SchmidtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  5. Corey v. VoorhiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1838

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  2. Packard-Bamberger v. GuaranteeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API