Legal Opinion

Elgart v. Mintz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 24, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On complainant's writ of attachment against defendant, the sheriff attempted to attach shares of the capital stock of Elblum Holding Corporation standing in the name of defendant. But the stock certificate was outside the State of New Jersey in the possession of the defendant, who is a resident of New York, and was not actually seized by the sheriff. Complainant, to satisfy the Uniform Stock Transfer law (Rev. Stat. 14:8-39), thereupon filed his bill praying that defendant be enjoined from transferring the certificate, and obtained an order to show cause why defendant should not be so…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Allman v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  3. Hermann v. Mexican Petroleum Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  4. Swetland v. SwetlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  5. Hervey v. HerveyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Di GaetanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Jurewicz v. Locals 1297, C., of AmericaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API