Legal Opinion

Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. Hauslein

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G. Bogebs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thobnton

The effect upon the policy, caused by the alienation of the property insured, is the only question argued.

One of 'the conditions of the insurance, made a part of the policy, was that, “in case of any sale, transfer or change of title in the property insured by the company, the insurance shall be void and cease.”

The title of the assured to the property, at the date of the policy, is not questioned; and the assignment to Seibert, the mortgagee, was made with the assent of the company.

After the execution and delivery of the policy and the making of the assignment, the assured sold and conveyed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stetson v. Massachusetts Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Power v. Ocean InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  3. Dix v. Mercantile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Lane v. Maine Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1835
  5. Illinois Mutual Fire Insurance v. FixIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fire Insurance Companies v. FelrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Wilson v. HakesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  3. Alton v. American Insurance Co. of NewarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. Farmers' Insurance v. ArcherOhio Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Forest City Insurance v. LeachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API