Kerr v. Holder
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Floyd county — -Judge Keece. August 1, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
1. The bill of exceptions will not be dismissed because the judge certified that it was “due,” instead of “true,” it being manifest, from the context, that this was a mere clerical error, and that his intention was to certify that the bill of exceptions was true.
2. Where there are two defendants, one may except without the other, and it is not necessary to make the party not excepting a party to the bill of exceptions when it is apparent that his rights can not be affected in any wise by the decision of any question presented for adjudication in the writ of error. Civil Code, § 6176; W. U.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Stapleton v. MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Brewer v. GroganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- American Harrow Co. v. DolvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cole v. Bank of BowersvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- McIntyre v. Zac-Lac Paint & Lacquer Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Brown v. HuskampSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Butler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- MacNeill v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.