Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Zac-Lac Paint & Lacquer Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1963No. 39924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhaedt, Judge.

Defendant in error urges that since plaintiff in error recites in the bill of exceptions that he “then and there accepted and herein now [sic] accepts and assigns the same as error” there is no assignment of error and nothing for this court to consider. He urges that this position finds further support in the recital in the brief of plaintiff in error that “plaintiff in the lower court then accepted and now accepts” to the judgment sustaining the general demurrer.

The language of this assignment of error in the bill of exceptions and the recital in the brief are, of course,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Holmes v. Phenix Ins. Co. of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Martin v. MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Phenix Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kushner v. McLartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Smallwood v. BickersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Miller County Board of Education v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Brantley Co. v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Albertson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API