Legal Opinion

Chicago Freight Car Leasing Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 91-2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The purpose of the 4-R Act is “ ' * * * to provide the means to rehabilitate and maintain the physical facilities, improve the operations and structure, and restore the financial stability of the railway system of the United States.’ * * * ” Burlington Northern RR. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm. (1987), 481 U.S. 454, 457, 107 S.Ct. 1855, 1857, 95 L.Ed.2d 404, 409, quoting Section 101(a) of the Act. Section 306 of the Act “ * * * * prohibits states from imposing taxes which result in discriminatory treatment of railroads.” General American, supra, at 3. In General American, the district court found…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Christensen v. GriffesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. Pendell v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. DeMoranville v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Christensen v. GriffesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API