DeMoranville v. Commissioner of Revenue
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.
The plaintiff, Philip DeMoranville, appeals from a decision of the Superior Court dismissing his challenge to the constitutionality of a State tax statute for failure to exhaust administrative remedies deemed “exclusive” by that act. St. 2005, c. 163, § 57B (j). In 2005, the Legislature enacted St. *312005, c. 163, §§ 57, 57A, 57B (abatement act), which authorizes the abatement — without interest — of capital gains taxes levied in 2002, later held unconstitutional. See Peterson v. Commissioner of Revenue, 441 Mass. 420 (2004) (Peterson I); Peterson v. Commissioner of Revenue, 444 Mass. 128…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wickliffe's Executors v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
- Sydney v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Madden v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Duarte v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Verizon New England Inc. v. Board of Assessors of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- 320 Fall River, LLC v. Bd. of Assessors of SeekonkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018