Legal Opinion

DeMoranville v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 3, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

The plaintiff, Philip DeMoranville, appeals from a decision of the Superior Court dismissing his challenge to the constitutionality of a State tax statute for failure to exhaust administrative remedies deemed “exclusive” by that act. St. 2005, c. 163, § 57B (j). In 2005, the Legislature enacted St. *312005, c. 163, §§ 57, 57A, 57B (abatement act), which authorizes the abatement — without interest — of capital gains taxes levied in 2002, later held unconstitutional. See Peterson v. Commissioner of Revenue, 441 Mass. 420 (2004) (Peterson I); Peterson v. Commissioner of Revenue, 444 Mass. 128…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Wickliffe's Executors v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
  3. Sydney v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Madden v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. Duarte v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Verizon New England Inc. v. Board of Assessors of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  2. 320 Fall River, LLC v. Bd. of Assessors of SeekonkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API