Haner v. Bruce
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The question raised by this appeal is whether a real estate attachment that is misindexed by the city clerk is valid against a subsequent bona fide purchaser who had no actual notice of the attachment. The trial court dismissed the attaching party’s claim. We reverse and remand.
On March 23, 1979, having obtained a writ of attachment in a pending suit against defendant Wendall Bruce, plaintiff filed the attachment with the St. Albans city clerk. At that time, a recorded land contract gave Bruce the right to purchase property at 58-60 Fairfield Street in St. Albans. Although the city clerk…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Braley v. FrenchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
- Curtis v. LymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
- Barrett v. PrentissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
- Burchard, Wilson & Co. v. Town of Fair HavenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
- Hunn v. KoerberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re FarnhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1986
- Lively v. Northfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Harris v. Maryland National Bank (In Re Harris)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Bosley v. BAC Home Loan Servicing L.P. (In Re Bosley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2011
- Lively v. Northfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.