Legal Opinion

Haner v. Bruce

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 6, 1985No. 84-319PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The question raised by this appeal is whether a real estate attachment that is misindexed by the city clerk is valid against a subsequent bona fide purchaser who had no actual notice of the attachment. The trial court dismissed the attaching party’s claim. We reverse and remand.

On March 23, 1979, having obtained a writ of attachment in a pending suit against defendant Wendall Bruce, plaintiff filed the attachment with the St. Albans city clerk. At that time, a recorded land contract gave Bruce the right to purchase property at 58-60 Fairfield Street in St. Albans. Although the city clerk…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Braley v. FrenchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  2. Curtis v. LymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  3. Barrett v. PrentissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  4. Burchard, Wilson & Co. v. Town of Fair HavenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
  5. Hunn v. KoerberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re FarnhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1986
  2. Lively v. Northfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Harris v. Maryland National Bank (In Re Harris)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  4. Bosley v. BAC Home Loan Servicing L.P. (In Re Bosley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2011
  5. Lively v. Northfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API