Curtis v. Lyman
Supreme Court of Vermont
[IN CHANCEKY.] This case was decided in Windsor county, March term, 1849, and the opinion was sent to the Reporter, without any of the papers in the 'case, by Judge Isham, with the suggestion that the same be reported, as it is referred to in the preceding case, Hunter v. Windsor and West Windsor.
1Opinion of the Court
The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court, which was delivered by
Hall, J.
This is an appeal from chancery. The bill is for the foreclosure of a mortgage in common form. The complainants are the mortgagees; one of the defendants, Edgerton, being the mortgagor, and another defendant, Lyman, being a purchaser under Edgerton.
The facts found and about which there is little or no controversy, are these:
Edgerton being indebted to the plaintiffs by note in the sum of $2000, mortgaged to them certain lands, which mortgage was transcribed upon the book of records of the town on the 11th…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Bishop v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Ritchie v. MetcalfeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Robison v. FishbackIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Calwell's Ex'r v. Prindle's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- Nickels v. SchollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.