Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Covington & Burling LLP
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 10, 2009No. 07-CV-1301PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Appellant Kathleen Barrett sued the law firm of Covington & Burling, alleging that it had denied reasonable accommodations for her medical condition, subjected her to a hostile work environment, and terminated her employment, all in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act. D.C.Code § 2-1402.11 (2001). The trial court granted summary judgment in Cov-ington’s favor, and this appeal followed. We affirm in large part, but reverse and remand for further proceedings with respect to a portion of the reasonable accommodation claim.
I. The Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Floyd v. LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sharma v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Leftwich v. Gallaudet UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.