United States v. Joseph Corona, III Lindsey McDonald
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
These federal arson convictions raise primarily Commerce Clause and double jeopardy concerns. We conclude that the convictions are within Congress’s commerce power. But we find that imposing separate sentences for arson, conspiracy to commit arson, and “using fire to commit conspiracy to commit arson” violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. We vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing.
I
In February of 1992, Joseph Corona, III, bought a two-story residential structure at 1637 Polymnia Street in New Orleans for $29,000. He insured the house for $45,000,…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Groome Resources Ltd, Llc, United States of America, Intervenor v. Parish of JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. GrimesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Frank Lafayette BirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.