Legal Opinion
Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 21, 1997No. Civil Action 96-1604PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER OF COURT
AMBROSE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of the Defendant, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”), to dismiss the complaint filed pro se by the Plaintiff, R.M. Smith (“Plaintiff’ or “Smith”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed.R.Civ.P.”) 12(b)(6). Plaintiff is alleging violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 and Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, as well as alleging a state law claim for breach of contract. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant NCAA’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- R.M. Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Renee M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- R. M. Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Buckley v. Archdiocese of Rockville CentreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- R. M. Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.