Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 1911PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This case and that of Veitch v. Jenkins, 107 Va. 68, 57 S. E. 574, arose out of a contract entered into between plaintiff in error, G. W. Lambert, and defendant in error, L. IT. Jenkins, which was construed in the first-named case.

The essential features of the contract are set out in Veitch v. Jenkins, supra, as follows: “ . . . L. H. Jenkins entered into a written agreement with . . . George W. Lambert, by which the latter engaged to purchase material, employ labor and superintend and erect lot the former a building in the city of Richmond for a book factory, in accordance with certain plans…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Burruss v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Hebb v. WelshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Wright v. SandersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mann v. ClowserSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. Nichols Const. v. Virginia MacHine ToolSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. Steinbrecher v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Wiebener v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Montgomery v. KaravasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API