Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Karavas
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1941No. 4562PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Chief Justice.
This action was brought by appellant to recover a balance of $8,735.70 and to foreclose a lien securing it, alleged to be due him by appellees upon a contract for the construction of a hotel in the town of Taos, New Mexico.
The appellees denied liability in any amount, and by cross-action claimed an indebtedness due them by appellant upon the same contract, in the sum of $13,344.12.
The trial court entered judgment for appellant in the sum of $1,250.15, as the balance due him after deducting certain credits found to be due appellees on their cross-action. From this judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Ayres v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Hammaker v. SchleighCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Kern Ex Rel. Kern v. St. Joseph Hospital, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Measday v. SweazeaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- City of Raton v. Vermejo Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.