Legal Opinion

Winterstein v. Mauntner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from that part of an order denying her motion to vacate or modify the defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars. It appears that the defendants are entitled to a bill of particulars but plaintiff objects to the demand upon the ground it easts an unreasonable burden upon her to comply therewith. The demand consists of fifty-nine separately numbered paragraphs containing over two hundred items. We recognize that the complaint is lengthy but this does not justify the meticulous and unnecessarily repetitious demand served herein. We have heretofore held that such a demand…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Mint Corp. v. Ex-Lax, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Movielab, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Lindly & Co. v. Telephonics Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. R. K. Corbin, Inc. v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. MontanteNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API