Legal Opinion

Lindly & Co. v. Telephonics Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

The complaint sets forth 7 causes of action. The defendant Lynch served a demand for a bill of particulars in regard to 120 items in 14 pages of single-spaced type. The plaintiff moves to vacate the demand.

Motion is granted without prejudice to defendant Lynch serving an appropriate demand or moving for an order for a suitable bill of particulars.

After more than six hours of study of the complaint and demand, and after having reviewed in detail only one third of the items, the court is of the opinion that though the defendant is entitled to some of the items, these are in the minority and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Mint Corp. v. Ex-Lax, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Winterstein v. MauntnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindly & Co. v. Karl H. Inderfurth Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1961
  2. W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. MontanteNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API