Legal Opinion

R. K. Corbin, Inc. v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars comprises ninety-three items. Many of these items seek an oppressive volume of detailed facts which are immaterial to the issues in this ease — such as data concerning merchandise distributed on behalf of firms other than the named defendants. Other items require such minute and petty particulars that they are unnecessary in the proper preparation of the ease or would result in unwarranted disclosure of evidence. Plaintiff has consented to furnish forty-three of the items. Some of the others, at least in part, are proper but should not be passed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winterstein v. MauntnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Milnes Co. v. Staten Island Board on Jewish Education, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API