State Ex Rel. Boyer v. Grady
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentClinton, J.
I respectfully dissent. The effect of the majority opinion is to permit repeal of any existing ordinance by the initiative process rather than by referendum alone. It thus abolishes in many respects the distinctions between initiative and referendum. This has grave consequences which I do not believe the court has taken into consideration.
The fundamental distinction between initiative and referendum goes far beyond the 30-day limitation on referendum, § 18-112, R. R. S. 1943, and postponement of the effective date of the ordinance enacted by the governing body, § 18-116, R. R. S. 1943. If the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Kelley v. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Klosterman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Heider v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.