People v. Cruz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court committed reversible error in admitting testimony from two police officers that bolstered the People’s principal eyewitness’s identification of defendant (see generally, People v Bayron, 66 NY2d 77, 81; People v Trowbridge, 305 NY 471). We disagree. The officers’ testimony corroborated that eyewitness’s testimony and "merely served as a necessary narrative of events leading to defendant’s arrest” (People v Jones, 160 AD2d 333, lv denied 76 NY2d 790; see, People v Welcome, 181 AD2d 628, lv denied 79 NY2d 1055).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. CasertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. BayronNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. TavarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.