Legal Opinion

Britton v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1971No. Docket 8013PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelley, J.

As partial return for work rendered to his employer the plaintiff-appellant employee received the benefits of a group policy of insurance which required that to

“any * * * employee * * * wholly and continuously disabled * * * and * * * thereby prevented from performing any and every duty of his occupation, the company shall pay * * * a weekly benefit * * * for the period of such disability but not exceeding 52 weeks for any one continuous period of disability. * * * [0]ne continuous period of disability shall include successive periods of disability due to the same or related cause which are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cottrill v. Michigan Hospital ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Topolewski v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Leski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stein v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Advanced Plastics Corp. v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  3. United Rentals (North America), Inc. v. Jerry Keizer, Grant Rent-All, Inc. And Mulder's Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Chrysler LLC v. Plastech Engineered Products, Inc. (In Re Plastech Engineered Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  5. Cochran v. Ernst & YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API