Legal Opinion

State v. Oliver

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1972No. 72-15PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In examining and thereafter determining the sufficiency of an indictment, it is of utmost importance that all the statutory elements necessary to constitute a crime be averred in the criminal charge. Davis v. State (1876), 32 Ohio St. 24; State v. Joseph (1926), 115 Ohio St. 127, 131. This condition is founded upon the constitutional right of the accused to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him. United States v. Hess (1887), 124 U. S. 483, 487.

Consequently, the omission of any material element or ingredient of an offense, as defined by statute, is “# * * fatal to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. State v. ChildersOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. JesterOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Summers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. State v. BurgunOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API