Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Hinckley Fibre Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the amount claimed by him as still due for cutting, peeling, and delivering at a specified place, according to a contract, made in 1920, between him and the defendant, a foreign corporation doing business in this State, 309 cords of rough pulp wood (already felled) on a certain tract of land owned by defendant, situated in the towns of Brighton and Morgan, at twelve dollars a cord, and for damages by reason of his being prevented by defendant from cutting, peeling, and delivering 350 cords of pulp wood standing on the same tract, under a second contract between…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  2. Roebke v. AndrewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  4. McNeish v. U. S. Hulless Oat Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  5. Frost v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Hendrickson v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Northeastern Nash Auto. Co., Inc. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  4. Bristol, Trustees v. NoyesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. Blitz v. BreenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API