Legal Opinion

Struck v. Kohler

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 19, 1920PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Carroll—

Affirming.

*518In May, 1919, the appellees, Kohlers, and the appellant, Struck, entered into a written contract by which, for a valuable consideration, the Kohlers agreed to convey to Struck lots No. 9 and 10 in block 2, Baringer Land Company, subdivision in Louisville, Ky.

It was stipulated in the writing that these lots should be “free from any restriction or condition which would prevent the erection or interfere with the use after erection of an apartment house, for residence purposes, of six or more stories, and containing forty or more apartments,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McMurtry v. Phillips Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Bolin v. Tyrol Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. McMahan v. HunsingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  4. Ainsworth v. ElderArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Courtney v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API