Legal Opinion
Durant v. District of Columbia Government
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-0025PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff, Earnest Durant, Jr., alleges that his former employer, the District of Columbia Government Department of Corrections (“DOC;” “department”), retaliated against him for prior protected activities and subjected him to a hostile work environment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. 1 Before the Court is defendant District of Columbia’s motion for summary judgment, [Dkt. # 67], as well as a motion to strike a supplemental Rule 26(a)(2) statement…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Durant v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Toomer v. PanettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Washington v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Miller v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Earnest Durant v. District of Columbia GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.