Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Hopkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1925No. 18834. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action, as originally brought, was against S. B. Hopkins and wife and one W. D. Godefroy as defendants. The complaint sought rescission as against Hopkins and wife and damages for fraud against Godefroy. To the complaint a demurrer was interposed and sustained on the ground that there was an improper joinder of causes of action. Thereafter an amended complaint was filed against Hopkins and wife alone. After the issues were joined, the case came on for trial before the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ evidence, the defendants moved for a dismissal, and this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Andrews v. Atlanta Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Hume v. Indiana National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Hager v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Fines v. West Side Implement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. AukampWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API