Legal Opinion

Godefroy v. Reilly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1925No. 18914. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

This is an action by respondent, as plaintiff, to recover a commission as broker upon an exchange of real estate between the appellants and one Hopkins, as shown in Reilly v. Hopkins, 133 Wash. 421, 234 Pac. 13, to which case reference may be had for a history of the transaction. The action was tried to a jury, but, at the close of all of the testimony, a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the defense and the cross-complaint was sustained, the jury discharged and a judgment rendered for the plain tiff in the full amount claimed, from which the defendant has appealed.

Many…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. Ten HopeWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Reilly v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valley Land Office, Inc. v. O'GRADYWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API