Legal Opinion

Haag v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 22, 2005No. A-8687PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Jeremiah Jay Haag was convicted of first-degree robbery, evidence tampering, and fourth-degree controlled substance misconduct. Haag appeals his robbery conviction, and he also appeals the sentences he received for all three crimes. Haag’s appeal presents three groups of issues.

First, Haag attacks his indictment on two grounds. He argues that the prosecutor failed to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. For the reasons explained here, we conclude that the omitted evidence was not “exculpatory” as that term has been defined in our case law governing a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  2. State v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  4. Dayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  5. Greist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API