Legal Opinion
State v. Craig
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 25, 1925No. 27158PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, O. J.
Appellants were convicted. of violating the first section of the Act 4 of 1924, known as the Anti-Mask Law. The charge in the bill of information, being substantially in the language of the statute, was that the defendants willfully, feloniously, and maliciously, and using a mask or cloth over the face as a disguise calculated to conceal their identity, entered upon the premises of Henry Reynolds and demanded admission into his house, with the intent to do bodily injury to him and to threaten and intimidate him, residing in said house.
The defendants moved to quash the bill of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- State v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Gulf Refining Co. v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- State v. DoremusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. AckermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Louisiana Independent Auto Dealers Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Wall v. CloseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Sternberg v. Board of Com'rs of Tangipahoa Drainage Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Pires v. YoureeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.