Legal Opinion

State v. Guidry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1917No. 22346PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Twentieth Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne; W. E. Howell, Judge. Armand Guidry was convicted of willfully and knowingly taking and carrying away without the consent of the owner certain oysters, shells, and cultch bedded or planted by lessee, under the provisions of the statute regulating the oyster industry, and he appeals from the verdict and sentence.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of willfully and knowingly taking and carrying away, without the consent of the owner, oysters, shells, and cultch bedded or planted by a lessee, under the provisions of the statute regulating the oyster industry of this state. The offense being a misdemeanor, he was tried by the district judge without a jury. On conviction he was sentenced to pay a fine of $301, and has appealed from the verdict and sentence.

The bill of information charged that the defendant did unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly take and carry away, without the consent or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DoremusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. City of Shreveport v. NejinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. State v. TrappSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. State v. AuthementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. Union Tank Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Hunter Co. v. McHughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. Rutherford v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1939

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API